June 2010

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Loleta Cheese Factory

, BP and the oil spill

QUOTE <"http://www.paulvids.com/ron_paul_videos.php"> Too much government interference in golf by Ron Paul Unfortunately, the disaster in the Gulf this week and continues the procession of BP's efforts to contain the oil, damage control, encourage residents along the coast to clean and defend their shores and its wildlife. Many have criticized the federal government in recent weeks, accused of did not do enough. The reality is that if the government can do much to relieve as well, it can increase the problem and mislead the suffering

For example, from the perspective of "doing something" the administration has adopted a unilateral ban on offshore drilling. It cons-productive. I am proud to propose and support with other legislation to lift the ban. Why punish other oil companies and their employees who work hard, who have nothing to do with this disaster, and have much better safety records?
And, as happens after disasters, countless people - even local officials and state government - appeared knew what to do and willing to help, but were discouraged by by such paperwork as oil continues to flow. The real problem is not lack of government assistance, but the government's inability to identify those solutions, and follow the lead. We saw the same phenomenon during hurricanes Katrina and Ike. It seems the main role of government in these situations is to find excuses to trample, hold meetings and press conferences, wasting money, punish scapegoats, and stack the regulations.
Yet even after the many examples of incompetence past, people turn to government to solve problems following disasters. A government that tries to "do everything for everybody" can cause considerable dependence induced, but ultimately it hurts the very people it is supposed to serve: a wait, helplessly, no hello outside Washington.
The government could help by requiring players their full responsibilities as well as damages and cleaning costs. I hope that efforts in this direction are genuine and that BP is indeed liable for any damage, not protected by liability caps under the table or reimbursed by taxpayers. Unfortunately, a large additional sum of taxpayers' money was slipped into the bill to come to bear the costs of cleaning the Gulf should have been assumed to BP. Taxpayers should not condone a major oil company that has caused such horrific damage on our shores.
It should be noted that BP is not exactly a bastion of free market capitalism. , Instead they invested in obtaining government grants, the orientation of policies in their favor, and regulations restricting competition BP was even a developer's lobbying cap and trade because of certain provisions legislation, and could benefit from it.

. Asking me, Quid, pressure groups, which supports that and vice versa?
my thinking is that attempts to keep the players strictly and fully responsible could end up being nothing more than a con game, where taxpayers will ultimately be the fall guy
If the idea of Government Action in Crises is to punish the innocent, the guilty replenish and increase the pump prices throughout the world, we would like them to do less, not more. ! Recent polls suggest
a reduction in aid for offshore drilling. We always need for oil, and lots of good jobs depend on this oil production. It is crucial to the functioning of our economy. But if the accidents continue to be treated this way, it is easy to understand why so many people see more disadvantages than advantages to offshore drilling, and it is also deplorable.

GO, I made a mini summary of the arguments liberals
the "Congressman Ron Paul criticized Obama's criticism of the BP Group, responsible for the spill of oil in deepwater in the Gulf of Mexico ..
he explains that this creates a type culture
"the government is responsible for everything. "detestable strong

He thinks that with a judicious interpretation of ownership (rather than state control) the situation was more favorable
Finally, he asserts that there should be no limit to the legal responsibility of BP

(rather whether the government legislates, and allows or disallows drilling in deep water, the simple fact to bear the true price of oil produced in these extreme conditions, including the cost operating the "security" have changed things)

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

When To Have A Shower After Waxing

Proposal liberal constitution and Panarchy

liberal constitution Proposal Panarchy and
...... preamble to enable everyone to live in peace and security ... Article 1

freedom for any individual (major), think speak and act on its own initiatives

article2
inalienable individual responsibility on the consequences of his actions, words and thoughts
Article 3
total freedom Association, for whatever forms, number of people involved, aims, methods of organization and
field ("private" = family, education, economics, religion, philosophy, politics ...)

Article 4
partners' liability for all consequences of the activities of the association, without a time limit

Articles 5
national consensus:

justice to preserve the right of everyone to live in peace and security, to enjoy the fruits his work and to dispose at will,
zero or one partner can not kill, steal, enslave, torture, rape, terrorize, defraud others ....
lies, false testimony can not be accepted
Justice is to be effective and will not tolerate impunity
she will always strive to repair the damage caused by victims to the extent possible

Article 6
state is abolished, only the assemblies' Advisory freely chosen representatives (in their own way) that each "community" can come together to brainstorm, to make proposals and find solutions to conflict and disharmony between groups concerned

Article 7
state is abolished, the duties of justice will be entrusted to individuals or groups of people most consensual of associations dedicated to serving the most appropriate level Article 8

state is abolished, if necessary, Persons wishing to join to choose a common representative, a spokesman, will do so through associations dedicated

Article 9
state is abolished, no tax or charge can not be taken, each association s 'require financial autonomy and manage its accounts as other aspects of his life according to its own statutes

Article 10 The freedom not to join an association, or to leave, will be jealously protected ...
(no one may be worried about not being affiliated with a religious, political, welfare ...)
my references: Frédéric Bastiat

http://www.wikiberal.org/wiki/Subsidiarit% C3% A9

video, the philosophy of freedom
Paul Emile Puydt attention: I ' not use the word "association" in the modern sense, this may represent a university as a couple, a professional as a business
(freedom to associate and organize themselves at will in pursuit of a common goal)

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Mature Woman Girdle .com

My political strategies unveiled for 0, 30 years ahead

What will be my political strategy for years to come?
what party, what candidate I would argue in the forthcoming elections?
In particular, my favorite 2lphrases:
* be available to protect life
* to be generous, he must be rich
remain my faithful tags ... I

very bad opinion of all those who politocards for their great majority are still strong characters "harmful "....
... more reason for them not to leave the open field, avoid them sign blank checks ...

to illustrate the difference:
the day my son and I left for Afghanistan
A politician dripping admiration for the courage
his son to him who engaged in a political struggle to ... .
............................ Neuilly!
Obviously, we do not have the same values!

after me, his master and the master of his master, some "secular" teaching and guiding my "personal search" and guide me on my way "mission", we mean well, it means just what I have to do what nobody else will and / or unwilling to do in my place ...

Well, good, Frederic Bastiat, although that sadly illustrates unknown for a majority of citizens,
part of these referees must, intelligence timeless, which I do not give up for anything ...

http://www.catallaxia.org/w/index.php?title=Sp% C3% A9cial: Search & search = & fulltext = Search Bastiat

.... and is affected by (not Grace) but the logic of his thought, which I accept as my party comrades to carry my cross, and on the forehead the infamous label of liberal ... I do not spare my pain to go spread the word ...

And even if an extreme (FN, Zip ...) invite me to explain a few crumbs of reality, I will accept the challenge ..

However, I preserve my supporters, jealous of its value, and
only admits those "pure souls" ... ie of candidates without compromises and pans virgin licking of waffling ...

short .... it not won!