When unionism campaigns against human rights 
Since 1789, mankind has taken a real awareness of the importance of guaranteeing the inalienable rights to everyone living on earth. Yet more than 200 years later, Quebec is still some delay in the law of man, and those most responsible are none other than trade unions.
There are almost 60 years, 10 December 1948, the General Assembly UN has adopted the most important text in its history, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These rights are defined as " the common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations so that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, by progressive measures, national and international recognition and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction . "In short, the highest international organization in the world decides to promote these fundamental rights. It is an ideal, but it's still a major goal to achieve.
And you will say:" And unions in there? ". You are aware that Canada allows the Rand formula (since the 50s, through a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada). What this means is that employees of a unionized company are obliged to contribute financially to the union. However, the reality is that this small open door led to abuse. Indeed, not only a worker is forced participate in the financing of the union (even if not wanted), but in addition, unions are forcing employees to join the union. Some will say that technically we are not obliged to join a union. The reality (for those who live on the same planet as me) is quite different. Take the example of the former professor of labor law, Mr. Réjean Breton, who despite his legendary obsession for unionism, was nevertheless forced to be a member of his union (on this subject, see http://cc. msnscache.com / cache.aspx? q = 8132421164313 & lang = en-US & mkt = en-CA & FORM = VCEN ). In short, no union job will not leave the choice to the applicant if he wishes to join the union or not. It's "You sign or you'll see elsewhere."
To return to human rights, Article 20 (2) of the Declaration states that "2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association. . Canada signed the statement, but it did not prevent the Supreme Court to wander and write judgments that went against this fundamental right, much less labor to shoot anything that speaks of abolish the Rand formula. In Quebec, this practice has been codified Article 47. For unionists, this is a sacrilege for not wanting a union. The union is the sole holder of absolute truth and human values.
When you think that in the ancient tribes of virtually all civilizations, we still had a form of organization headed. There was a village leader and always a kind of spiritual master (eg a wizard). In Quebec's history, spirituality was occupied by the village priest and / or clergy. But since the '60s, because religion has taken a major setback, it is undeniably unions have become the "witch" of the village and have replaced the Catholic church (on this subject, I suggest you read "The National-syndicalism" Réjean Breton and Brigitte Pellerin, Éditions Varia). The unions have a disproportionate power. Marc Bellemare said: "The Prime Minister was Henri Massé" (The Sun Journal, Friday, February 17, 2007). It has become a grave sin to question the authority of association, especially in a democratic union strong-arm where the votes are hand-thrown.
I therefore appeal to unionists: when are you going Finally, respect the fundamental human rights?
